FSIS Administrator Discusses

Staffing, Labeling, E. coli And Outreach

 

By Janie Gabbett on 6/16/2008 for Meatingplace.com

                        

In his first year as administrator of USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service, Alfred Almanza has tackled challenges including adequate inspection staffing levels, consistent and accurate meat labeling and better outreach to owners of small plants.

He addressed these issues in a recent interview with Meatingplace.com .

Meatingplace: There has been a lot of discussion about FSIS inspector staffing levels at federally inspected plants. Are current staffing levels adequate?

Almanza: I do think we are adequately staffed. We continue to hire. We are using an intern program to hire into slaughter inspection. We are using relocation bonuses. We are using hiring bonuses for areas where we are short-handed. We also have the resources to adjust between districts. For example, if Denver is low, Dallas can loan them inspectors. We also have relief inspectors who work part-time and are not counted in the permanent workforce numbers.

Meatingplace: From the rumor mill, some of our readers claim FSIS inspectors are mandated to write a minimum number of NRs (Noncompliance Records). Is this true?

Almanza: I'd say that's false. A more accurate description is that whenever a plant has zero NRs, you would assume that it would be a perfect plant. We have to document deficiencies and have their preventative and corrective measures documented. I'm not aware of any quotas, and certainly I have made it very clear to field operations that, yes, our expectations are that deficiencies are documented, but we are not going to order or direct any of our inspectors on any number of NRs to be documented on a day, a month, etcetera.

Meatingplace: Where is FSIS in the process of evaluating whether to expand the beef products it would declare adulterated if contaminated with E. coli O157:H7?

Almanza: One of the things we are really focusing on now is bench trim. We are looking at different products in a systematic approach to see what makes sense to address first. Then we will look at the risk that is involved in the other products, whether it is in-tact primals or subprimals. We are not going to talk it to death, but I think it would be unfair for me to say we'll have something (by a certain date).

Meatingplace: FSIS just this week launched its first of three workshops for small and very small plant owners in Houston, Philadelphia and Raleigh, N.C. What are you doing for those who can't travel to these locations?

Almanza: We are recording these sessions and making transcripts available on our Web site and as Podcasts. We are also putting them on DVDs and CD-ROMs that we can mail out.

Meatingplace: Last week Tyson's antibiotic labeling was pulled. How long will it be before FSIS might come out with new rules around such labeling?

Almanza: First we are gathering information from all companies that use any type of antibiotic labeling. I would say by late summer we will start the public meeting process.

 
For more Meatingplace.com news, Click Here.
 


 

 

Home   About   Food Safety   Meetings/Events  Regulations   News   Links   Site Map
- American Association of Meat Processors - P.O. Box 269 - Elizabethtown, PA 17022 -
- Phone: (717) 367-1168 - Fax (717) 367-9096 -
info@aamp.com