Citing pending litigation, the U.S. Department of Agriculture
declined to comment on a lawsuit filed Wednesday alleging
the agency retaliated against John W. Munsell, president
of Montana Quality Foods & Processing, for criticizing
the agency during a 2002 outbreak of E. coli O157:H7.
Filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., the
suit contends that USDA/FSIS officials subjected Munsell's
plant to intensive, repeated E. coli testing and briefly
shut down the facility, despite his claims that E. coli-infected
ground beef in his plant was purchased from ConAgra. Munsell
alleges that his warnings were ignored and that USDA/FSIS
officials refused to trace the source.
However, testimony by a FSIS deputy administrator during
a December 2002 Senate hearing indicates the agency believes
its actions were justified, and that Montana was unable
to supply evidence that the contaminated beef was from
ConAgra. During the hearing, Deputy Administrator William
C. Smith testified that "compliance officers attempted
to locate … intact samples of the ConAgra coarse ground
beef that Montana … had named as the source of the E.
coli contamination. However, since the coarse ground in
question was produced on Aug. 30, 2001, no fresh or frozen
coarse ground products remained for testing. As a result,
FSIS could not confirm the link between Montana Quality
Foods' product and the supplied product."
Smith also testified that after a class I recall of 270
pounds of Montana product was issued in January 2002,
FSIS inspection personnel conducted standard follow-up
samplings, as FSIS policy mandated, to verify corrective
action had been taken. Samples collected on three dates
in February 2002 all tested positive for E. coli and,
according to Campbell, "FSIS advised [Montana] that there
was a problem with their food safety system, which required
more corrective action."
Later the same month, FSIS notified Montana "of the agency's
intent to suspend the assignment of inspectors for its
raw ground processes," Smith said. "FSIS's actions were
based on an inadequate HACCP system and three positive
E. coli O157:H7 samples found in February."